Evaluation of the effectiveness of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomography in thoracolumbar fusion surgeries

Haluk Cem Cakaloglu; Bulent Guclu

doi:10.5281/zenodo.14600150

Authors

Haluk Cem Cakaloglu University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-2097
Bulent Guclu University of Health Sciences, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-5706

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14600150

Keywords:

Intraoperative fluoroscopy, pedicle screw placement, postoperative computed tomography, thoracolumbar spinal fusion

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgeries. comparing intraoperative two-way fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomography (CT), and to analyze the influence of spinal anatomy and biomechanics.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 94 patients who underwent thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery. Demographic data including age, gender, and surgical indications were collected. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative CT images were analyzed to assess pedicle screw placement accuracy.

Results: Among the 519 pedicle screws placed, 496 (95.6%) were graded as A or B in the intraoperative fluoroscopy, whereas 23 (4.4%) were C, D, or E. Postoperative CT findings demonstrated a significant difference (p<0.001) in screw placement accuracy, with 483 (93.1%) screws rated as A or B. Moreover, the postoperative CT showed a higher precision in determining the screws’ alignment with vertebral bodies, stability, and potential complications. The correlation between intraoperative and postoperative imaging modalities indicated substantial sensitivity (93.8%), specificity (95.6%), positive predictive value (98.8%), and negative predictive value (83.3%).

Conclusion: Postoperative CT emerges as a crucial imaging method in enhancing the success and safety of pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion surgeries.

References

Virk S, Qureshi S, Sandhu H. History of Spinal Fusion: Where We Came from and Where We Are Going. HSS J. 2020;16(2):137-42.

Rodriguez-Morales J, Méndez-Viveros A, Pineda-Hernández C, Parra-Romero G, Ariñez-Barahona E, Guartazaca-Guerrero S, et al. Incidence of neurosurgical pathology of the spine in population of Mexico City. Cir Cir. 2021;89(6):806-10.

Prasse T, Hofstetter CP, Heck VJ, Meyer C, Wetsch WA, Scheyerer MJ, et al. Current evidence on where to end a fusion within the thoracolumbar junction most preferably - A systematic literature review. Neurochirurgie. 2022;68(6):648-53.

Oppenlander ME, Clark JC, Kalyvas J, Dickman CA. Indications and Techniques for Spinal Instrumentation in Thoracic Disk Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(2):E99-E106.

Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(2):247-55.

Yang Z, Sun Y, Deng C, Dong X, Hao L. Comparative efficacy of robotic-assisted and freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement in spinal disorders: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2024;18(1):121.

Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Korres DS, Papadopoulos K, Sakas DE, Pneumaticos S. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and computed tomography. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2009;19(1):41-8.

Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 studies. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):370-5.

Liu H, Zhou ZY, Wei JX, Zhang M, Bai M, Huang AB. Comprehensive analysis of pedicle screw implantation in the C7 vertebra using computed tomography-based three-dimensional models. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):96.

Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Strömbeck A, Maly P, Sundgren PC. Reliability of low-radiation dose CT in the assessment of screw placement after posterior scoliosis surgery, evaluated with a new grading system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(9):941-8.

Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(1):11-4.

Tarawneh AM, Haleem S, D'Aquino D, Quraishi N. The comparative accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic and navigation-based techniques in cervical pedicle screw fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;18:1-8.

Yoshida G, Sato K, Kanemura T, Iwase T, Togawa D, Matsuyama Y. Accuracy of Percutaneous Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement Using the Oblique Fluoroscopic View Based on Computed Tomography Evaluations. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(4):630-8.

Perdomo-Pantoja A, Ishida W, Zygourakis C, Holmes C, Iyer RR, Cottrill E, et al. Accuracy of Current Techniques for Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Spine: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 51,161 Screws. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:664-678.e3.

Burström G, Cewe P, Charalampidis A, Nachabe R, Söderman M, Gerdhem P, et al. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography is as reliable as conventional computed tomography for identification of pedicle screw breach in thoracolumbar spine surgery. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(4):2349-2356.

Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Spine. 2011;33(2):E39-46.

Katonis P, Christoforakis J, Kontakis G, Aligizakis AC, Papadopoulos C, Sapkas G, et al. Complications and problems related to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:86-94.

Proietti L, Scaramuzzo L, Schirò GR, Sessa S, Tamburrelli FC, Cerulli G. Degenerative facet joint changes in lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without fusion. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(3):375-9.