The Importance of Adequate Programming Dual-Chamber Pacemaker in Physically Active Patients

Authors

  • Márya Duarte Pagotti Arrhythmia Unit, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Sávia Christina Pereira Bueno Cuoresano Clinic; Arrhythmias Unit, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Cinthya Ibrahim Guirao Gomes Arrhythmias Unit, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Patricia Alves de Oliveira Rehabilitation Unit, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca Arrhythmias Unit, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Denise Tessariol Hachul Arrhythmia Unit, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6857901

Keywords:

Dual-chamber Pacemakers, Exercise Testing, Pacemaker Wenckebach, Physical Activity

Abstract

Limitations to physical activities and sports practice are frequently observed in pacemaker's users, due to patient's difficulties in judging their real physical capacity after device implantation and because of inappropriate programming. In this paper, we describe the cases of two patients with diagnosis of complete atrioventricular block and structurally normal heart, who started having symptoms of exercise intolerance after pacemaker implantation. The pacemaker programming was then individualized, based on treadmill tests, according to the needs of each patient. We concluded that exercise testing was an important tool to guide proper electronic programming of pacemakers during exercise.

References

Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 1;42(1):17-96.

Mulpuru SK, Madhavan M, McLeod CJ, Cha YM, Friedman PA. Cardiac Pacemakers: Function, Troubleshooting, and Management: Part 1 of a 2-Part Series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 17;69(2):189-210.

Kenney T. The nuts and bolts of implantable device therapy pacemakers. 1st edition. United Kingdom: Wiley; c2015. Chapter 19, Upper-rate behavior; p. 219-32.

Huizar JF. Pacemaker timing cycles and special features. In: Ellenbogen, KA; Kaszala K. Cardiac Pacing and ICDs, Sixth Edition. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; c2014; p. 211-71.

Mathony U, Schmidt H, Gröger C, Francis DP, Konzag I, Müller-Werdan U et al. Optimal maximum tracking rate of dual-chamber pacemakers required by children and young adults for a maximal cardiorespiratory performance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 May;28(5):378-83.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-20

How to Cite

1.
Pagotti MD, Bueno SCP, Gomes CIG, Oliveira PA de, Scanavacca MI, Hachul DT. The Importance of Adequate Programming Dual-Chamber Pacemaker in Physically Active Patients . J Clin Trials Exp Investig [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 20 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];1(1 March-June):22-7. Available from: https://jctei.com/index.php/jctei/article/view/9